Solar Decathlon Underdog, Santa Clara University, Shows That Team Diversity in Product Development and Design Can Do Wonders
Beating out the likes of MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Georgia Tech and the University of Colorado at Boulder, Santa Clara University (SCU), located in the Bay Area of California, took third place in an international solar house decathlon. The U.S. Secretary of Energy dubbed the SCU team the "Cinderella story from California".
The Solar Decathlon is an international contest drawing entries from Germany, Canada, Spain, and the U.S., in which students actually construct a small house representing the best in design and construction of an eco-friendly home. I've posted a video below that depicts what a bunch of students go through to build a cutting-edge eco-house and enter the contest. Previously unknown for its engineering resources and talent, SCU was a clear underdog from the outset (a German university took first and the University of Maryland took second).
After taking a couple weeks to rest my blogging brain, I'm proud to come back with a story like this one. Thankfully, this story offers more than the fact that it has to do with SCU, an institution near and dear to my heart. When asked what contributed to their unprecedented success, SCU team leader James Bickford replied:
"Our strength was in the diversity of our team," Bickford said. "We are dominated by engineers, but we brought on communications majors, philosophers, anthropologists, artists."
While the group debated various aspects of the project, "those struggles are what made it a good house," he said. "Those diverse and creative thoughts produced a better product than any one discipline could have by themselves."
The benefits of a diverse team in product development aren't a novel concept. IDEO, a world-class design company that describes itself as specialists in human factors, psychology, business, design, engineering and manufacturing, is renowned for its ability to create diverse teams for the development process and create truly innovative and effective products.
Although the concept of capitalizing on team diversity isn't new, it's so rarely used effectively. One of the major reasons is the presence of "struggle" that comes with dissenting opinions. Generally, hashing out conflicting opinions with others just isn't fun. But, as demonstrated by the SCU students' Cinderella story, the benefits of doing so can be great. Is everyone agreeing with you?

